Nonetheless the author's willingness to have what seemed like more than a dozen physicists essentially saying 'this is nonsense' or 'this is wrong' about some of his points, right on the same page where he made various claims, was pioneering and would have been a good model for later books. When I asked Richard Feynman about it specifically he said it didn't save it, and that both it and Tao of Physics were, in his experience, unreadable. The footnotes were basically commentary by physicists on his understanding and presentation of modern (since 1900) physics.ĭoes anyone else's edition (mine got lost) have that? I thought it was particularly a good way to do such a New Agey physics book. This article is supported by Publications Taskforce. This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics Template:WikiProject Physics physics articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. Books Wikipedia:WikiProject Books Template:WikiProject Books Book articles To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books.

Dancing wu li